Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studio Yotta
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Studio Yotta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, looks like a company portfolio. IgelRM (talk) 15:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Oregon. IgelRM (talk) 15:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Video games, Companies, and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Lean delete. I'm having a hard time finding non-trivial coverage in news sources. [1][2] (not sure of their reliability, but seem ok for pop culture on a quick glance?) are all I can find. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 07:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Can’t find the kind secondary source coverage needed for notability. Contributor892z (talk) 20:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.