Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Storm of the Imperial Sanctum
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 21:08, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Storm of the Imperial Sanctum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Throughout the months of existence of this article, it has grown very little. There is plenty of wording, but completely insufficient sources that supply little value, besides some complimentary DotA and Wikipedia sentiment. If you look at the sources, you will find that they constitute the mod's website, the Wikipedia article for StarCraft II, the Wikipedia article for Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne, the Wikipedia article for StarCraft: Brood War, a third-party map archive forum, another reference to the mod's website, the Wikipedia article for Defense of the Ancients, the mod's forum, a link to Battle.net's homepage, a link to the Wikipedia Battle.net article and a post on PlayDotA.com advertising the game. NONE of those link to any relevant topics in the article and simply seem to only say the names of real major titles and act like their referencing will excuse the insufficient notoriety of this subject. Of course, it takes some time for this procedure of AfD nomination to go through, so if there are any major developments or notoriety that may be explained, I invite all who wish to contribute to do so. DarthBotto talk•cont 05:34, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) DarthBotto talk 05:34, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- DarthBotto talk 05:34, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I cannot find anything that warrents notability for this map. Although I do not play SC2, I do feel the sources are very weak. Skullbird11 (talk) 12:16, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Obvious Delete - *if* there's any "notability" whatsoever it would be exclusive to the SC2 community. I can't find any reliable, significant coverage. --Teancum (talk) 13:01, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Storm of the Imperial Sanctum is just one of the many Dota variants in Starcraft 2. It has not reached the cultural and gaming relevance of the Warcraft 3 map, DotA. It does not warrant a Wikipedia article.--Dotaveteran (talk) 01:22, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:38, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.