Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Splitvt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 09:09, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Splitvt

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable and article is unsourced. Google books shows some hits for potential sources as uncovered by User:Cyclopia, but that coverage is trivial. Books mention it in dictionary style definitions, one or two give usage examples. Another mentions it as a source of potential hack vectors. None of these things confer notability. Miami33139 (talk) 21:16, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Seven days have passed since this listing and no sources have come forward, not to mention the many many months that have gone by since the article was first created. JBsupreme (talk) 06:31, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.