Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonic Temple art & music festival

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:48, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic Temple art & music festival

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an event that did not happen. The coverage I found, like https://www.dispatch.com/news/20200612/coronavirus-music-festival-organizers-concert-goer-sue-dr-amy-acton, is WP:ROUTINE, and falls into the category of "this is going to happen" or "this band is scheduled to appear at the festival". It may happen next year, but unless third-party sources can be found, it doesn't seem to meet notability criteria. If it does stay, let's move it to the correct capitalization: Temple Art & Music Festival. Walter Görlitz (talk) 08:33, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Walter Görlitz (talk) 08:33, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Walter Görlitz (talk) 08:33, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Walter Görlitz (talk) 08:33, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and WP:CRYSTAL. (t · c) buidhe 08:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep images of the event"info". columbusunderground.com. Retrieved July 8, 2020.. (t · c) RazorJackal 05:06, 8 July 2020 (EST)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Per RazorJackal, it appears it did happen in 2019, which weakens the nominator's argument. But was it notable?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:19, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Per PMC, reviews of festival."review". newnoisemagazine.com. Retrieved July 8, 2020."review". loudwire.com. Retrieved July 8, 2020."review". cincymusic.com. Retrieved July 8, 2020."review". musicfestnews.com. Retrieved July 8, 2020."review". columbusalive.com. Retrieved July 8, 2020. Previously Rock on the Range for 11 years"info". metalnexus.net. Retrieved July 8, 2020., Sonic Temple art & music festival held an inauguration."info". thechimeramagazine.com. Retrieved July 8, 2020.(t · c) RazorJackal 03:12, 8 July 2020 (EST)
Comment It's best not to conflate Rock on the Range with this festival. They're two separate topics. And we don't use refs. I removed the ref tags. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Per PMC, The inaugural Sonic Temple Art + Music Festival capped off the Danny Wimmer Presents 2019 spring festival season with sold-out crowds of 120,000."attendance". domaincle.com. Retrieved July 8, 2020.(t · c) RazorJackal 05:29, 8 July 2020 (EST)
Comment Thanks for the updates, RazorJackal. It appears that the only edits you've made have been to events related to Danny Wimmer Presents. In light of of Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guidelines, do you need to declare your involvement with the company? At the very least, you're a Wikipedia:Single-purpose account, and this is concerning. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:02, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Per Walter Görlitz, No, WP:DNB.(t · c) RazorJackal 10:34, 8 July 2020 (EST)
- I am not trying to bite, but I am quite concerned at your choice of subjects and the facility you have with the system. If you say you have no CoI, I accept that, but I still find it suspicious. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep then delete 90% of the material in this COI-like terribly written article. IMO it appears to have enough coverage and real world prominence to where it can and should have the article. The next step would then be to delete 90% of the material as this terribly-written article has the kind of material that a COI promoter would want in it rather than what readers would want to read / what is in the sources. North8000 (talk) 13:45, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:24, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.