Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Son Sik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Daniel (talk) 11:16, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Son Sik

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Already been draftified before, and couldnt find any sources Begocc (talk) 10:32, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 10:37, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 10:37, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 10:37, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, obviously notable, and plenty of reliable sources online in Korean. Wikishovel (talk) 10:35, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Would you be so kind as to provide the best WP:THREE to look at? Roxy177 (talk) 18:12, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a third reference. Wikishovel (talk) 18:48, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly notable and available sourcing sufficient for WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:22, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Now notability is evident. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:33, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.