Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sol survivor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. per nomination withdrawl JForget 00:08, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sol survivor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about an unremarkable game that may not meet WP:Notability. elektrik SHOOS 00:41, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - reviews at Eurogamer, Avault.com and PC Format magazine (June 2010). Also some other websites that I've not heard of so may or may not be reliable sources. Dont forget to check the custom search at WP:VG/RS before bringing things to AfD! Marasmusine (talk) 10:22, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep per Marasmusine's findings plus all these reviews of the game listed at Metacritic here. –MuZemike 19:55, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawing nomination per the above two comments. Though the article definitely needs cleanup. elektrik SHOOS 19:58, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Article tagged for clean up. -- Jelly Soup (talk) 09:54, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.