Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigma Editions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). No consensus has occurred here. Discussion regarding potential merge targets can continue on the article's talk page. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:03, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sigma Editions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly NN company. While it's founders are probably notable, I've been unable to come up with anything that would pass WP:GNG or WP:CORP for this project of theirs. There is a mention of it on the antiopic website but they're a business partner. The Dissident Aggressor 06:41, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Parmentier (band). -- haminoon (talk) 07:04, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
comment - I disagree with merging, because it is verifiable the label has releases other than those by Parmentier. The most notable of the artists listed appears to be Vladislav Delay. I'm not even sure Parmentier is notable, in fact I was going to comment that the Sigma Editions article appears to be a walled garden, with the exception of Delay. At first glance the subject appears to be possibly notable by the number of notable artists signed, but the articles for these artists are likewise missing sources. Right now I'm leaning delete, but possible sources include this. I couldn't find anything else. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:17, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the walled garden observation and had come to that same conclusion. Unfortunately, the only way to break out of a walled garden is to delete the NN label since artists can inherit notability from their label, but not the label from the artist. The Dissident Aggressor 19:09, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I said merge with Parmentier because they ran the label, not because they were on the label. However because there is so little verifiable information on the label and Parmentier scrape against the notability guidelines, it may be better to merge it into both Rosy Parlane and Dion Workman's bios. -- haminoon (talk) 20:33, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think that would be better. The Dissident Aggressor 15:48, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:26, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 17:26, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to one of the founders if possible as the best my searches found was Books. SwisterTwister talk 05:32, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.