Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sea Scouts (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:24, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sea Scouts (band)

I declined the speedy deletion nomination, so I'm bringing it here for further evaluation. I remain neutral on the matter. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:29, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't assert notability per WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 20:34, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —TexasAndroid (talk) 21:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Provided that verifiable references can be found, based on the article, it is clear that it satisfies #4 of the criteria and is therefore notable. Dan arndt (talk) 02:12, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I am not sure if this band meets notability, but it does have a (admittedly sparse) allmusic page, so it is clearly more than just a YouTube band. Ideally, sources can be found. Not sure what effort has been made to find sources per WP:BEFORE. Rlendog (talk) 18:37, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This source mentions touring in North America and Europe. Station1 (talk) 00:34, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per User:Station1's source, seems to meet criteria #4 of WP:MUSIC. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:24, 30 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:24, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Were the subject of a lengthy article in Mess+Noise magazine. The Companion to Tasmanian History by Alison Alexander, published by the Centre for Tasmanian Historical Studies at the University of Tasmania calls them a "well-known local band of the 1990s". --Canley (talk) 12:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.