Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Yee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Yee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I put this biography of a perennial political candidate up for PROD but it was (reasonably) declined as he founded a political party, Central Party (British Columbia). However, the electoral record of that party is very small, listed as 41 votes in one election and 101 in another. This candidate is known only for his political campaigning (his main job was apparently "security officer" and I wonder whether it is worth having a mostly uncited BLP for him, when an article for his political party exists and in which any electoral information could be added. (I acknowledge that his lengthy track record indicates he is not just a "one event" BLP, but notability doesn't look convincing to me; perhaps I am unfamiliar with the standards expected for perennial losing candidates though) TheGrappler (talk) 23:58, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable... I would say merge with Central Party (British Columbia), but there is no sign that is notable either. Hairhorn (talk) 02:37, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - can't find sufficient evidence of notability in reliable sources. Robofish (talk) 12:06, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Central Party (British Columbia). As a perrenial candidate and founder of the party, merging verifiable material (such as election rsults) would be appropriate. -- Whpq (talk) 21:05, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.