Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Raval

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. The arguments opposing deletion are entirely deficient in their applicability to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, while the arguments presented to delete are largely focused on a failure of meeting WP:GNG. Daniel (talk) 01:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjay Raval

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable author and producer. Fails WP:GNG and WP:PRODUCER. --Gazal world (talk) 06:32, 9 December 2023 (UTC) Gazal world (talk) 06:32, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable. MisterWizzy (talk) 06:52, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep.Give chance to edit becauseit is partially notable. Tablasingh (talk) 06:52, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Gujarat. Kpg jhp jm 07:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails to meet WP:GNG. Freinland (talk) 07:40, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable right now . fails in WP:GNG Worldiswide (talk) 04:51, 11 December 2023 (UTC) ( Blocked sockpuppet of Wiki97828)[reply]
Keep It should not be deleted because he is very popular amoung people in Gujarat. Takarsinh (talk) 06:52, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He is an eminent personality amongs gujarati community as writer, motivitional speaker and as a film producer. Due to which many people search about him on internet. But because of not having Wikipedia article about him many people will not able get proper information about him. And many time people get wrong information about. so as per my point of view this page should not be deleted.ShahBhai (talk) 02:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Wikipedia doesn't care if an article subject is "popular", what matters is if sources can establish notability which no one here seems to be talking about. Please offer some policy-based arguments focusing on references either in the article or ones you have located.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I find not substantial mentions of this individual, [1] trivial, but I'm unsure if it's even the same person. Delete for lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 14:32, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.