Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sambhav Ratnakar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:50, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sambhav Ratnakar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability per WP:NAUTHOR. Already speedied twice. No significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Prod contested without explanation by anonymous editor, 7 minutes after I prodded. Norvoid (talk) 16:23, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Norvoid (talk) 16:24, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete A7 and salt if necessary. --Fauzan ^{✆ talk}_{✉ mail} 16:32, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find any significant coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. Sarah-Jane (talk) 21:18, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Clearly non-notable. No RS found. ƬheStrike Σagle 15:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because it is a non-notable book by the same author:

Delete but not WP:A7 – yes this fails notability (for a person born in 2000, should have ample Internet coverage if it is actually notable) but the article does have a claim of significance. sst✈^(discuss) 15:47, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.