Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saila Kariat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The only "keep" argument is from a block-evading sockpuppet, and in any case it merely says "I don't think it fails WP:TOOSOON", without any attempt to explain why. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Saila Kariat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined WP:PROD. Subject is obviously not notable per the general notability guidelines. —Wasell^(T) 14:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 15:07, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 15:08, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 15:08, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I don't think it fails WP:TOOSOON.--Musa Talk 16:26, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the film as it seems to be best connected there, still currently questionable for own article. SwisterTwister talk 06:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with you. She have won three awards which shows notability and good sources are also provided even before release of her debut film. There is no doubt that she can become more notable after release of the film so there is no need to delete or redirect it.--Musa Talk 08:53, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:17, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 23:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This looks like a clear WP:TOOSOON to me... I'd support keeping it in a few months, when her film is out. That said, I'm willing to be convinced otherwise... Musa Raza, would you please explain why you feel that this article is not covered by WP:TOOSOON? Fieari (talk) 00:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Forget notability, there is no credible claim of significance in this article. The movie she is directing has not been released. The cited award is a university award, which numerous universities give out every year. The other 3 IBM awards seem to be internal company awards which she got while she was working there. At this point, she wouldn't pass WP:GNG,WP:PROF or WP:DIRECTOR. This is way too soon. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.