Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SBS Transit Service 163
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:56, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- SBS Transit Service 163 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to fail the GNG; it's just a bus route. bobrayner (talk) 00:44, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:12, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:12, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 23:59, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- STRONG Delete - This fails any number of qualifiers. There is nothing special about this bus route. It would be unwise to open the door to having every bus route in the world given it's own article on Wikipedia. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 19:58, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG, WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTTRAVEL. Wikipedia is not a travel guide.--Charles (talk) 18:15, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.