Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubies of Eventide

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rubies of Eventide

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined Prod. I am on the fence regarding the WP:N of this game. Admr Boltz 20:46, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The page looks well sourced and written. Numerous sources include high profile websites such as GameSpot and IGN. Skullbird11 (talk) 22:57, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Even though the game isn't around anymore, it once did exist and was a successful MMORPG for a few years. Even though the official companies sources shut down many of the other sources are notable. Also the "archive. User:Access Time —Preceding undated comment added 17:13, 10 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:13, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Notable, but the article needs editing - some of the paragraphs still use present tense even though the game is history now. --Ezhuks (talk) 15:51, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. IGN review is sufficient for notability. Szzuk (talk) 23:08, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.