Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rene Heger
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:17, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Rene Heger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:GNG. Article tries to assert notability by association, but no reliable, independent sources seem to exist asserting that Heger himself is notable. The bulk of the article has been copied from Heger's Facebook page, neither an independent nor a reliable source. ubiquity (talk) 15:43, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment should this be speedied as a copyvio? Atlantic306 (talk) 19:25, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Apparently it was already speedied for that, plus spam & lack of significance, on May 3 by CorbieVreccan (talk · contribs). I didn't see the original so I don't know how close this one is. The text is not an exact copy of the Facebook page, but it's an obvious cut and paste. ubiquity (talk) 19:37, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- In that case it'll have to be AFD. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:47, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- The earlier version of this article had a very high overlap when I checked it with earwig's copyvio tool, so I deleted primarily on that basis. After you pinged me I went and checked the current version against the Facebook page. While there is still a bit of duplicated text, it's not the total copy and paste that the earlier version was. However, right now the search engine function on the earwig tool is borked, so unless you have a specific website to compare it with, the best chance at finding other pages it could have been copied from in addition to Facebook would be to put sections into google and see what comes up. Best, - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 04:46, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- In that case it'll have to be AFD. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:47, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Apparently it was already speedied for that, plus spam & lack of significance, on May 3 by CorbieVreccan (talk · contribs). I didn't see the original so I don't know how close this one is. The text is not an exact copy of the Facebook page, but it's an obvious cut and paste. ubiquity (talk) 19:37, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 13:40, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 13:40, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as nothing actually convincing for any applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 19:10, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 19:10, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170etalk 17:29, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170etalk 17:29, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - I nominated the previous version as a speedy on ground of notability and I see no difference here. This looks like self publicity for a non-notable actor. Velella Velella Talk 20:00, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.