Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pronk music
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:19, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Pronk music (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article does not assert its legitimacy as a genre. The description sounds like something that could exist, but I've never heard the actual term "Pronk". Google search doesn't turn up any verifiable sources. Ibaranoff24 (talk) 19:57, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Jmundo 00:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral. I've seen it used (specifically in reference to The Cardiacs), but it was in an online discussion and I have no idea how accepted the term is or whether it's been used in published works. — Gwalla | Talk 00:58, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I was only able to find one passing mention in a book referring to the Cardiacs by that term. This neologism apparently is used just for that band, as indicated by a google search and even this wiki article itself. Ironically enough, the band's frontman has explicitly repudicated the notion that they are a progressive rock band and instead identifies the band as a pop group. So let us respect his wishes and delete this from wikipedia. --Bardin (talk) 07:27, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 23:39, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I also searched around, and can find no significant coverage. Term is not well enough established to pass notability at this time Chzz ► 01:50, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.