Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professional Speaking Association
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:43, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Professional Speaking Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable group and the only relevant link I have found is this press release and this trivial mention through a news article. The press release also cites "Professional Speakers Association" as their name but I have also found few relevant sources with this despite searching with both Google US and Google UK news. It seems that the group has also used http://www.professionalspeakers.org/ and http://www.professionalspeakingassociation.co.uk/ (the latter is the current link that the article uses) but both of them now lead to http://www.professionalspeaking.biz/. As a result of their generic and simple name, I have found results for individual speakers or other associations ("Professional Speaking Association of Florida", National, etc.). Google Books found this that only mentions "Professional Speakers Association" so I wouldn't know if it is relevant or not. SwisterTwister talk 18:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Lack of independent sources. Kilopi (talk) 03:51, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources. If in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources is added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.