Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prabin Gautam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:53, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prabin Gautam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Puff piece article. No single points any info outside his business. Fails WP:BIO. Need real verifiable refs that can prove notability. scope_creep (talk) 16:14, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:03, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as blatant advertisement — "He stands out from the crowd..."; "recognised as 'The Digital Entrepreneur'"; "He continues to refine and add to his knowledge"; and so on. I'm unsure about notability though. Laurdecl ^talk 06:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Reads like a promo resume press release. But that alone does need necessitate deletion, just a rewrite. It also needs to be wikified. Cannot find anything sufficient for notability though. Aoziwe (talk) 12:25, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Even if he were notable, this page is a torrid mess. Wikipedia is not a webhost or resume service. There is nothing in the page right now that shows how this person is notable - in fact he appears to be nothing more than a run of the mill business person. Bearian (talk) 19:51, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.