Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Place of Peace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:57, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Place of Peace

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The few cited sources do not support notability per WP:GNG, most are primary, and the rest do not appear to be WP:SIGCOV. glman (talk) 22:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and South Carolina. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: I think references 1, 2, and 5 are significant secondary coverage. The article does need a lot of work since many of the other references are primary and/or irrelevant. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:57, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
1 is good, I agree. 2 is a passing mention, not WP:SIGCOV - "The family, including Tsuzuki’s children Yuri and Seiji, was also responsible for the creation of Place of Peace at Furman University." 5 is a list, it's better than two, but still a trivial mention. I don't think this meets WP:GNG. glman (talk) 03:52, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Buddhism and Japan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- In addition to what's already in the article this piece from The Chronicle of Higher Ed shows that it meets GNG.
- [1] Central and Adams (talk) 17:37, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:31, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this article, a bit a of an absurd nomination. In addition to coverage noted by previous keep votes, there's an AP article [2] which was syndicated as far away as California & a reworked version of which appeared in the Japan Times [3]. Also passing coverage in Forbes as a key part of naming the college campus one of the most beautiful in America [4]. DCsansei (talk) 15:54, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes GNG microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 21:45, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.