Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pet Circle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:20, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pet Circle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notbable company, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:38, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per substantial coverage in multiple RS: [1] [2] [3]. SmartSE (talk) 12:32, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:24, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

keep border line but SMH and Business Review articles do push it pass WP:GNG Gnan garra 03:41, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - this is a small, private company, but it appears that it's been able to garner a lot of free media from reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 14:14, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 14:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 15:21, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – looks to me to meet notability criteria, both for its media coverage and its mentions in other fields, such as tech (Deloitte Fast 50). It is Australia's largest online pet supplier, according to sources. Libby norman (talk) 16:17, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.