Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pastoralism is challenge in Tanzania
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:19, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Pastoralism is challenge in Tanzania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Recently prodded article (deleted 12-9-2012) that is now back in the same essay form. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOV The Banner talk 00:06, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as blatant original research. JIP | Talk 05:54, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - the article could possibly exist as a neutral Pastoralism in Tanzania, which strikes me as a notable topic. There are references, but they are not inline, and much of what is claimed could be challenged - e.g. "There have been several conflicts among pastoralists." But frankly, I don't see any likelihood of rescue. StAnselm (talk) 07:30, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:20, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOR and WP:NPOV. As StAnselm notes, some of the references might be used for an article on Pastoralism in Tanzania. The article's creator's good work (and good intentions) can be seen at Natural resources use in Tanzania, but this personal-view essay needs a complete re-write. Lone boatman (talk) 12:49, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as original research, or if needed, then incubate as Pastoralism in Tanzania. Bearian (talk) 20:50, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.