Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panghal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:20, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Panghal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:GNG. There is another clan called the Pangal, who have had disputes with the Meitei people (see here), but that is not offered as an alternate spelling and I suspect that the pronunciation might be different. Bhim Singh Dahiya, for whom we once had an article, seems to mention them in passing ([1]) but he is known to be a pseudo-historian. Other than that, my checks at GBooks, JSTOR, news sources etc are only returning mirrors and unreliable British Raj sources. The same applies to my own personal library of caste-related books. Sitush (talk) 13:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jim Carter 16:03, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:48, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:41, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.