Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Padh
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:32, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Padh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable slang term for flatulence in foreign language. PirateSmackKArrrr! 16:29, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment so be BOLD and redirect to flatulence. Drawn Some (talk) 17:46, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Why though --- this isn't even an english word. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 18:32, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure if redirects in other languages are allowed. Even if they are you first need a source. PirateSmackKArrrr! 20:50, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to flatulence. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 19:27, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I suppose it really doesn't matter but why the re-direct. Surely a dicdef of a non-english word is a straight delete. One doesn't, after all, create redirects from other non-english words for fart (Furz for instance). Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 21:58, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Suggested redirect for a combination of WP:NOHARM and WP:IAR. Don't really know if this would survive an RFD or CSD per {{db-r1}} though. =) --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 16:01, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair enough. As I said, it doesnt really matter. I've noticed some Hindi-slang or Hindi-based-slang articles turing up. Interesting. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 22:00, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a Hindi/English dictionary. Yintaɳ 11:39, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable non-English dictionary entry. No justification for redirect either, unless we want a few thousand contextless redirects for fart and many other articles. Abecedare (talk) 01:56, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Abecedare (talk) 02:00, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above resasons. Would have been better if it was just speedied. A redirect is of no use because there are no articles linking to it Special:WhatLinksHere/Padh. --Deepak D'Souza 05:09, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.