Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oye! Times

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oye! Times

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure about notability. Claims to be a Canadian website Galaxy Kid (talk) 17:07, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:10, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:10, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:10, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Social network is no indication of notability. But still compared to the pages of reliable websites ( facebook likes and twitter followers of other reliable websites ). This website has got 18 facebook likes till date and 168 followers. Galaxy Kid (talk) 17:14, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a search in Google finds a massive spam attack, but nothing real. DreamGuy (talk) 17:41, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:46, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP - It is a news website. Not ordinary but a reliable and collaborative. It doesn't have widespread coverage in US or Canada but does report worldwide news from the primary and reliable sources of that particular country. Arjann (talk) 17:04, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This news Website don't have notability. Eden's Apple (talk) 17:52, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. the keep reason given above is simply ITEXISTS, which is not sufficient. DGG ( talk ) 04:44, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now at best as searches only found their own articles, no considerably third-party coverage. Newspapers may be considered notable but there's simply no obvious improvement yet. SwisterTwister talk 04:48, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.