Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nakshatra MCA meet@NIT Calicut
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. G11: Blatant spam, and G12: Unambiguous copyright violations Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:43, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Nakshatra MCA meet@NIT Calicut (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Has no visible verifiable references from reliable sources. COI. Fancruft. Contested PROD. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 00:23, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:13, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:13, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:13, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:13, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article does have references, but not formatted and cited properly. In External links, under 'Nakshatra Newsreports', there are newspaper articles covering the event. --Anbu121 (talk me) 18:47, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as purely promotional. I have no opinions on notability, but the article is 100% advertising, and probably a copyvio as much of the material appears to be snippets from either this site, or past sites set up for the event. -- Whpq (talk) 16:43, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.