Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Little Geek
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 02:49, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- My Little Geek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable. Only 6 library holdings in worldcat. None of the sources are reliable. (Fairfax is a local newspaper) DGG ( talk ) 01:28, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete This book fails our notability guideline for books. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 03:05, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per above. I'd also argue against the merger, as there aren't enough sources to show notability for the series as a whole. I've warned the article creator against COI, since I have reason to believe that this is the author trying to add himself to Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:05, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.