Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mujtaba Farooq

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 14:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mujtaba Farooq

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability, Autobiography - ArtsRescuer • Talk me 12:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Very notable Indian-Muslim leader, but article needs better sourcing and rewrite, that I'll start working on. Thanks. Picomtn (talk) 12:27, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Request Hi @MichaelQSchmidt: and @Nvvchar: Can you please advise as to what WP:Indian policies/guidlines/sourcing apply to this articles subject please? Thanks. Picomtn (talk) 12:27, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 13:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 13:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Alternative search per WP:INDAFD: Mujtaba Farooq) --Sam Sailor ^Talk! 13:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Judging from the 76,000+ WP:INDAFD hits, subject is a well-known figure in Indian politics and meets WP:BASIC; I have added one citation, and I think this is merely a question about starting to dig into the sources and build the article. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 13:31, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per meeting WP:POLITICIAN and WP:BASIC. It's a stub, but it can grow over time and through editorial efforts through the many available sources. Deletion does not benefit the project nor its readers. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 14:18, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Obvious improvements needed, but significant coverage in reliable sources demonstrated through WP:INDAFD. AusLondonder (talk) 00:44, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.