Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Warrigal Public School
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Mount Warrigal, New South Wales. Content under the re-direct if anyone wants to perform the merge. StarM 22:31, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Mount Warrigal Public School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
fails WP:ORG no real assertion or evidence of notability. Michellecrisp (talk) 06:30, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 06:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nom. Clearly not notable, and a google search didn't turn anything up. Nick-D (talk) 07:24, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —Cunard (talk) 07:42, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:COPYVIOfrom [1] ... fix it, I'll likely change my mind.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]- I don't see a copyright notice on the page, which means no copyvio. MuZemike (talk) 17:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't understand MuZemike's comment here but I also don't see the copyvio Paulmcdonald sees either. Perhaps it's been corrected already? DoubleBlue (Talk) 18:35, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- What I meant was that there is no claim to copyright on the web page (i.e. there's nothing saying "©2008 Mount Warrigal Public School" or however copyrights are claimed in Australia; I don't think it's that much different than here in the United States). You cannot claim copyvio for material not known to be under copyright. Hope that clears things up. MuZemike (talk) 18:47, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, IANAL but I believe we treat all original authorship as copyright per Berne Convention unless it's explicitly declared free use. DoubleBlue (Talk) 23:49, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep it's been fixed, I'm okay with it!--Paul McDonald (talk) 00:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, IANAL but I believe we treat all original authorship as copyright per Berne Convention unless it's explicitly declared free use. DoubleBlue (Talk) 23:49, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- What I meant was that there is no claim to copyright on the web page (i.e. there's nothing saying "©2008 Mount Warrigal Public School" or however copyrights are claimed in Australia; I don't think it's that much different than here in the United States). You cannot claim copyvio for material not known to be under copyright. Hope that clears things up. MuZemike (talk) 18:47, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't understand MuZemike's comment here but I also don't see the copyvio Paulmcdonald sees either. Perhaps it's been corrected already? DoubleBlue (Talk) 18:35, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see a copyright notice on the page, which means no copyvio. MuZemike (talk) 17:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Mount Warrigal, New South Wales as per precedent for primary schools. -- Eastmain (talk) 16:46, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Mount Warrigal, New South Wales, where it can be discussed in context of the community and expanded with Reliable Sources until an independent article is justified. DoubleBlue (Talk) 18:35, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/redirect to Mount Warrigal, New South Wales per normal practice. TerriersFan (talk) 23:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.