Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle A. Valentine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle A. Valentine

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neither the author nor any of the books are notable. There are no references and extensive searches with Google, and newspapers.com have failed to turn up any reliable sources. Leschnei (talk) 21:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Leschnei (talk) 21:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. The article hasn't a single ref and there's no proof this person pass WP:N, WP:AUTHOR or any other notability criteria. Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 21:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not meant to be a lightly annotated guide to the internet, which is what we become when we had articles sourced only to the webpage of the subject.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. No RS at all.Deathlibrarian (talk) 05:57, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This author clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. The article has not a single reference or secondary source to it. Juggyevil (talk) 14:05, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly fails WP:GNG MaskedSinger (talk) 13:47, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:NOTCATALOG. Fails GNG & NBIO. Platonk (talk) 23:36, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.