Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maylona

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice against recreation with reliable sourcing. A Train^talk 06:56, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maylona

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It seems to be a meaningless piece of writing or at least insignificant fictional place. Diako ^{« Talk »} 04:54, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:38, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:11, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Cannot find anything to hint at notability. Aoziwe (talk) 14:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Caution Article title is "Maylona". Article content spells it as "Maylorna". So above templated AfD links and searches may well be very misleading. However the latter gives even less google hits than the former. Aoziwe (talk) 14:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete uncited and huge verifiability concerns. LibStar (talk) 04:00, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Can't find any proof of notability. If it's important enough, a writer will come back and try again with better info that we're not seeing. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 20:23, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.