Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Shane
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Neutralitytalk 15:38, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Marc Shane (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability per WP:GNG. Article has been speedy deleted and recreated without modification multiple times. West Eddy (talk) 19:41, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt An unusually extended, yet typically sad, autobio. Extra points for sentence fragment in lead. Why do people insist on embarassing themselves this way? EEng (talk) 19:49, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There need be no modification as the information stated is accurate.
- Delete As above, no indication of meeting WP:GNG - none of the supplied references actually refer to him at all. noq (talk) 19:55, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What would you like? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anon360 (talk • contribs) 19:56, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Neither of those documents would help your cause. We need evidence of notability not of your name - please read that link and also WP:Autobiography. noq (talk) 20:10, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not meet Wikipedia's WP:BIO standards. And Adoil Descended (talk) 21:31, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable. Given the repeated creations protect against future recreation. QU TalkQu 20:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Falls far short of meeting WP:GNG. First Light (talk) 21:35, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:02, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.