Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manuk Hergnyan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 22:02, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Manuk Hergnyan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Résumé-like WP:BLP of an economist and investor, referenced entirely to his own self-published content with no evidence of independent reliable source coverage about him shown at all. As always, the notability test is not the things the subject says about himself, it's the things journalists do or don't say about him in the third person in real media — that is, you don't make a person notable for creating print or film content by referencing said content to itself as proof that it exists, you make a person notable for that by referencing it to other people doing independent third party analysis of its significance. Bearcat (talk) 07:15, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 07:15, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 07:15, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia articles are meant to be built on works about someone, not on works by them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:29, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this likely vanity page. Nothing in this article is appropriate; Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. Lack of coverage in independent reliable sources. FalconK (talk) 01:07, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 17:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete delete, delete, delete. This is promotion. Oaktree b (talk) 22:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.