Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manickam Muthar
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:26, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Manickam Muthar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A PROD tag was removed without explanation or addressing the cited need for reliable sources. Essentially this public school official does not meet the general notability guideline and there are no assertions of notability. There are no reliable sources and none were found on a search (Google Books/News returned zero hits for the full name). Also, Wikipedia is not a memorial. Ubelowme U Me 02:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nothing suitable for Wikipedia and the article reads like a personal biography rather than an encyclopedia article. Unfortunately, I believe any reliable and useful sources may not be English as my Google US and Google India search provided absolutely nothing. I briefly searched with Google Sri Lanka but found that there isn't a Sri Lankan version of Google News. We should also consider that any sources from his time probably haven't been scanned or transferred to the Internet (the Internet isn't as advanced for the Middle East and the India-Sri Lanka area). SwisterTwister talk 03:20, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:37, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:37, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 10:27, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Article does not indicate notability and no sources found which might justify an article. --Michig (talk) 10:44, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.