Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mandyland
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete under A7, and quite possibly other criteria as well. Hut 8.5 21:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Mandyland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It doesn't seem like it belongs in an encyclopedia. Peter Sam Fan 18:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Weak Keep as WP:BELONG is not a valid argument. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 19:03, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete per WP:G11 and WP:A7, article is just a mindless essay by the article's author about themselves. - SanAnMan (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete seems to me to be a pretty clear WP:A7 with no real indication of why it should be considered notable. I note that Mandy Cat Kitana has also been speedied recently. JMWt (talk) 20:09, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete per A7. I find no claim of significance, just a very creative (if not somewhat odd) way of writing an autobiography. --Non-Dropframe talk 20:54, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete - It's copyvio of http://www.mandyland.com/about.html, just as Mandy Cat Kitana was. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 20:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Glad to see the speedy tag on it. It is written horribly and doesn't meet notability anyways. NikolaiHo 21:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.