Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maks SF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maks SF

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional, questionable notability, refs are not independent, ^{Atsme📞📧} 18:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 talk contribs 00:24, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 06:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sources all primary or unreliable, though do ping me if you find relevant, reliable Belarusian sources. No useful redirect targets. czar 07:07, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – As stated above, notability is not clearly established. V2Blast (talk) 08:46, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – I checked the version of article from 20 June 2017‎. The reference #4 is reliable. Also I added a reliable source from experty.by and an independent review to the fourth album. --Jarash (talk) 15:34, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jarash, please review the following guidelines which I highly recommend for new editors who create or edit new articles that end up here because of notability issues and/or sourcing issues: Wikipedia:Notability_(people) and Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources#Questionable_and_self-published_sources. Please don't hesitate to ask if you have further questions. ^{Atsme📞📧} 16:49, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.