Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mad Sheep Ridge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is for article retention. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:38, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mad Sheep Ridge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We normally keep most geographic features, regardless how sparse may be the information, but I'm not sure this is significant enough to be included DGG ( talk ) 05:24, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is a valid stub referenced by USGIS NIS. As you wrote, we normally keep most geographic features, regardless how sparse may be the information. Gjs238 (talk) 11:52, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep perhaps as I myself was actually finding these recently and never thought anything particularly else of them, since they are applicable enough for landmarks. SwisterTwister talk 19:48, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Geographic features are notable, and the solution to a stub article is to improve it, not delete it. Smartyllama (talk) 18:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.