Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MadStone
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:10, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- MadStone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I was able to find reviews from only two outlets: IGN and WiiWare World. The latter was folded into Nintendo Life, so the NL review is just a duplicate of that one. QuietCicada - Talk 14:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. QuietCicada - Talk 14:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It got a WP:OFFLINE review in Nintendo Power: Link and Club Nintendo: Link. As Wikipedia does not ignore sources just because they aren't online, the article seems notable. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:17, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep with the sources given in the above comment. seems ok Oaktree b (talk) 15:24, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.