Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MHITS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 12:21, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MHITS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only purpose is to create for blatant promotions. I must say, that is professional work writing such misleading promotional article. Light2021 (talk) 19:54, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the blatantly obvious history of advertising-only account explain enough especially since all of their contributions not only focused with this one article, but it of course advertised the company therefore, now considering the sheerness of advertising information and sources, there's literally nothing here guaranteed of advertising thus delete. SwisterTwister talk 06:19, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This is a spam article Nick-D (talk) 22:49, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- a product brochure / investor prospectus in the guise of a wiki article. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:05, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.