Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise Dear

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:43, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Louise Dear

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, as coverage is not sustained.

The article has 3 citations. The first is a dead URL for an art store and as such would not be sufficiently independent if an archive copy could be found. The second and third, coverage in Creative Boom magazine and This is South Devon, a local paper, appear to be reliable secondary sources, but this is not sustained coverage as required by the GNG.

A search for sources turned up several art stores, but no independent, reliable, secondary sources with significant coverage. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 11:43, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 11:43, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 11:43, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not finding sufficient sources to pass WP:GNG. Curiocurio (talk) 13:03, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:35, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I see no reviews, collections, or exhibitions in good galleries... Appears to be mainly a commercial artist doing contracted work. Does not fit any of our notability guidelines. --- Possibly ☎ 22:31, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.