Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los Chupacabra
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:19, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Los Chupacabra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Proposed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Martial_arts/Article_Review 5th May 2010, User:Jmcw37 as secretary.
WP:NRVE Wikipedia:WPMA/N "No reliable sources found to verify notability" jmcw (talk) 10:46, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —jmcw (talk) 10:46, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article makes no real claims of notability and has no independent sources, nor could I find any sources indicating notability. He appears to be just a local/minor-league wrestler. Papaursa (talk) 05:09, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Clearly fails the General Notability Guideline and is very close to a speedy being a blatant case of not even trying to claim notability aside from naming names as influences and even that is questionable. RICK ME DOODLE YOU DOODLE 09:38, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable. Article doesn't even make a claim. Fails WP:GNG. Astudent0 (talk) 16:19, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't even make a serious claim of notability. Horrorshowj (talk) 18:20, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete CSD A7 per the three comments above this one. AinslieL (talk) 08:23, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable as has already been said. Podgy Stuffn (talk) 03:01, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable, & article does not show notability. Tzu Zha Men (talk) 17:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.