Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films about philosophers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW. postdlf (talk) 17:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of films about philosophers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The list would probably be far to long. Also, a category called Category:Films about philosophers already exist. — Music1201 ^talk 23:43, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I don't understand the nominator's suggestion that this list would be far too long. It seems to me that Hollywood produces fewer films about philosophers than it produces about, say, Marvel Comics characters. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 23:55, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. All evidence seems to point out that the article would have a similar length to the List of films about mathematicians. The list of films about philosophers would be an important new resource for readers of wikipedia. --Caracas1830 (talk) 04:42, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above and WP:CLN/WP:NOTDUP. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 06:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Certainly not too long, and the existence of a category has no bearing. Seems a perfectly reasonable list. --Michig (talk) 07:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:LISTOUTCOMES pursuant to the guideline on categories, lists, and navigation templates with emphasis on WP:NOTDUP. Readable prose size is currently 378 B (65 words). Sam Sailor ^Talk! 11:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 11:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 14:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 14:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for the reasons already stated above. Aoba47 (talk) 01:52, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.