Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional frogs and toads in animation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to List of fictional frogs and toads. seems to be a valid point that there is some content that could be merged Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of fictional frogs and toads in animation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A list that appears to be a redundant fork of List of fictional frogs and toads, which already has a full section on animation. I am assuming it was initially split off due to size concerns at the time, but that no longer appears necessary. As both lists specify that the entries should be restricted solely to notable examples, when you remove the entries here that do not meet that criteria, what is left is identical to the list already present at List of fictional frogs and toads, making a separate list or any kind of merger unnecessary. Rorshacma (talk) 15:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Animal, and Lists. Rorshacma (talk) 15:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:REDUNDANTFORK. It looks like the main article already lists the notable examples, making this an unnecessary duplicate. (No objection to a redirect if someone really thinks it's important.) Shooterwalker (talk) 16:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as a title that should not hold an article (per nom) but which is a reasonable {{r to section}}. jlwoodwa (talk) 16:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:50, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clear example of WP:OLIST and WP:REDUNDANTFORK. cyberdog958^Talk 20:07, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above nomination. No indication of notability and an unneeded split off an already dubious page in terms of notability. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge the missing entries to List of fictional frogs and toads - this does not seem to be complete, missing Tiana (The Princess and the Frog) and possibly Kermit the Frog - and redirect. I agree that this is a WP:CONTENTFORK, but the article title does get a reasonable number of hits and therefore should be preserved as WP:AtD, and WP:REDIRECTSARECHEAP. Current consensus is also that the target's notability is not "dubious", as determined here. Daranios (talk) 10:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per others, leaving the article around would seem to encourage recreation when we really shouldn't be getting this granular. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge the missing entries to List of fictional frogs and toads and then redirect it to there to preserve the article's history. I would not be opposed to the article being recreated if there was SIGCOV/analysis on toads and frogs in animation. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 15:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge since not all entries are over there. Dream Focus 00:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of fictional frogs and toads per WP:REDUNDANTFORK. This will also preserve the page history for any editors planning to merge content into that article, which is necessary for attribution. Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 07:25, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.