Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of GUI testing tools (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW. Consensus is that the list should be kept, cf. WP:LISTOUTCOMES, and that references can be improved to meet WP:LISTN. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor ^Talk! 22:27, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of GUI testing tools

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Queryable speedy delete request. The previous AfD gave "keep". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The previous AfD was closed keep, but I'm not really seeing an argument for deletion here. Very many of the entries are sourced: I can't think of a reason why most cannot be. Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Every entry in the list is notable and has an article. It follows many such lists across Wikipedia. There is no criteria for notability of lists of links that I know of and the subject itself, GUI testing tools, is notable. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Perfectly reasonable list. Sourcing can be improved if that's an issue. I don't see a rationale for deletion here. --Michig (talk) 06:54, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - a reasonable list to have. Blythwood (talk) 10:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and snow close. This nomination was simply a response by a bitter editor whose own page was appropriately deleted, trying to enforce their own sense of equal treatment. —swpb^T 13:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I couldn't agree more. 208.81.212.224 (talk) 20:05, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - a useful list to have. --Dcirovic (talk) 18:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.