Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilah Parsons
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Lilah Parsons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reason :No sufficient Notability Ascar123 (talk) 15:10, 23 January 2017 (UTC) (Ascar123 (talk) 15:10, 23 January 2017 (UTC))
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 January 23. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, joe deckertalk 05:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, joe deckertalk 05:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable model.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:39, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.