Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let's Meow Meow!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wifione ^Message 04:30, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Let's Meow Meow!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no notability for this adult video game. Fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 22:33, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 02:22, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - Delete because the article doesn't have any coverage in third party, reliable sources. It doesn't establish notability. Weak because I read the article, and I'm not willing to do much searching for sources for this game, for fear of what dark reaches of the internet that search would lead me to... Sergecross73 msg me 03:13, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete - Mostly per above; I know that Wikipedia isn't censored, but with something like this it would be nice if the author(s) of the article would save us the displeasure of having to look up thing that might be a bit more...er..."interesting" than we particularly care to view when verifying an article.Tyrenon (talk) 15:47, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Did some moderately thorough searching for information, could only find user provided data on sites where almost anyone can put something up. No credible profiles or reviews by major gaming sites. SilentVendetta (talk) 04:30, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.