Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonid Sednev

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No consensus to delete after two reslistings. (non-admin closure) Dusti^*poke* 19:32, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Leonid Sednev

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

How is this person notable enough for Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan12w (talk • contribs) 18:12, 17 June 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (confer) @ 20:58, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 18:39, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I'm confused about why you consider this non-notable since you never gave any reasons. A notable novel was written about him that mixes both fiction and fact. This book is also about him. There is also [1]. This person was not just an insignificant kitchen boy, but was a big help in reporting how an imperial family was murdered. How is someone who brought us such important details due to be being a witness as well as have two books about him non-notable? SL93 (talk) 07:19, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:13, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.