Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Neilson (2nd)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 03:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No sources. Simon \\ KSK Yes we can! 23:24, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I found numerous hits on Google for female wrestler Kim Neilson. Proxy User (talk) 00:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep - WP:GOOGLEHITS isn't a policy, and numerous website verify her existence. The nominator should have taken the liberty to attempt and cite sources in the article. Though she is verifiable, her notability may be in question.--TRUCO 21:01, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Never did anything notable and was not in any notable feuds during her brief WWE and TNA stints. TJ Spyke 21:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 22:09, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Why delete it; she's real enough, and although she didn't do anything notable for some people; I bet she did other places. Fiddler96 (talk) 17:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- FYI, blocked as a sock of User:Sinofdreams. --barneca (talk) 17:45, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. The sites i check did indeed show she existed, but there really was little else to indicate notability, or more importanly to write a comprehensive article.Yobmod (talk) 11:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I looked for some pics on google but 'seems there are quite a few Kim Neilson[1]. Who created her page anyway? Kalajan€·₣ 15:14, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- see [www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/profiles/k/kim-neilson.html here] Kalajan€·₣ 15:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmmm... Seems a hoax actually (that ref was added here) Kalajan€·₣ 15:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Noap, she isn't [2] Kalajan€·₣ 15:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply to...every one of his comments - online world or wrestling is unreliable, and even though we know she exsits, there is no reliable refs, making her fail WP:N. SimonKSK 21:36, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Wrong. Just because there are no reliable sources, does not meet she does not exist or that notability is not established. She has had a run in major promotions, which satisfies WP:ATHLETE and because this is pro-wrestling, it satisfies WP:BLP.TRUCO 21:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply to...every one of his comments - online world or wrestling is unreliable, and even though we know she exsits, there is no reliable refs, making her fail WP:N. SimonKSK 21:36, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Noap, she isn't [2] Kalajan€·₣ 15:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmmm... Seems a hoax actually (that ref was added here) Kalajan€·₣ 15:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- see [www.onlineworldofwrestling.com/profiles/k/kim-neilson.html here] Kalajan€·₣ 15:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.