Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerri Chandler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Leans towards "keep", though the end result is the same. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:44, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kerri Chandler

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:MUSICBIO. Unable to locate reliable secondary sources to support notability. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:21, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Succeeds, assuming that's the appropriate term for a vote to keep the article. Prompted by noting the nomination in passing (sorry, Magnolia677), I did a substantive upgrade of the article, happening from Google's lead to have focused on the artist's international standing and the many peer acts that have Wiki pages. Plenty of good sources, I think, found for it; just scratched the surface it felt like. Cheers. Swliv (talk) 00:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 05:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:04, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Slightly weak keep. Meets WP:MUSICBIO through coverage in reliable sources: [1],[2],[3],[4]. — sparklism ^hey! 17:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The first two sources appear self-published, while the last two sources are just a few sentences long. Magnolia677 (talk)

The first two sources are artist biographies at AllMusic and Resident Advisor, neither of which are self-published. Thanks. — sparklism ^hey! 07:40, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.