Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Black (Artist)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 16:57, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Karen Black (Artist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete − The subject falls way short of WP:ARTIST. This article is about an "emerging" artist. Almost all of the references are published by the subject, or her agent: Tristian Koening. There is only one third party reference, and that is a single page in a magazine that will be published next month. The subject does not meet the general notability criteria WP:N or the specific criteria WP:ARTIST. Any online searcher prove futile because there is a very famous American actress, screenwriter, singer, and songwriter of the same name. — Fly by Night (talk) 02:23, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree the article fails to meet the standards of WP:ARTIST and there will probably not be enough hits for this page.Housewatcher (talk) 06:00, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 06:56, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Emerging artist means exactly that - other sources are dubious referential value. she has a very limited recognition. catalogues don't count as reliable third party sources Ohconfucius ¡digame! 08:46, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —AllyD (talk) 18:01, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Emerging artist = non-notable. Joe Chill (talk) 21:18, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not yet notable, see WP:NEXTBIGTHING. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:21, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.