Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justicialist Front
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:34, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Justicialist Front (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Completely minor parties or alliances, only active in 1 province in 1 election, no really notable, most are irrelevant and only participated in elections as part of a bigger alliance. Most of them are not active any more. Yilku1 (talk) 02:33, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
- Front of Jujuy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Name of the alliance of the Radical Civic Union in the province in 2003, 2005 and 2007
- Alliance New Front (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Name of the alliance of the Civic Front of Córdoba in the province in 2003 and 2005
- Committee for the Reconstruction of Revolutionary Communism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Spliter group of a minor party, not even a party
- Democratic Liberal Party of Córdoba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Minor party, always part of Union for Córdoba. Only participated in 2001 and 2003
- Federal North of Jujuy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Only got 2% in 2003 as part of an alliance
- Front of the Popular Movement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Only in 2003
- Independent Citizens of Tucumán (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Only 1% in 2005 and as part of an alliance with Republican Proposal in 2009 with 9%
- Movement for a New Country (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Always part of Front for the Renewal of Concordia
- New Space of Entre Ríos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Name of the alliance of the Civic Coalition ARI in the province in 2003 and 2005
- Party of the Hope of the Province of Buenos Aires (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- I don't even think this party existed at all. The only party with a similar name participated only in Buenos Aires city in 2005 with 0.5%
- Provincial Union of Entre Ríos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Irrelevant and minor party
- Revolutionary Labour Bloc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Parliamentary group in the senate, not even a party
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all per above. --MewMeowth (talk) 20:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete — Per nom. CentreLeftRight ✉ 22:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per norm. Luciapop (talk) 11:25, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - non of these organizations seem notable enough for stand-alone articles per WP:ORGSIG – Epinoia (talk) 16:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.